Linked by Kroc Camen on Sun 9th May 2010 12:34 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y "Dear Ubuntu, for the last couple years life has been good. Every time I've shown you to a friend or family member, they've compared you to what they're familiar with--Windows XP or Vista, mostly--and by comparison you've looked brilliant. Yeah, your ugly brown color scheme was a bit off-putting at first, but once people saw how secure, simple, and reliable you were, the response was almost universally positive. But recently, things have changed ..."
Permalink for comment 423465
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Poor
by UltraZelda64 on Mon 10th May 2010 03:02 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Poor"
UltraZelda64
Member since:
2006-12-05

Explain why Vista is shit, and please be specific as in show me benchmarks.

Why does shit have do be benchmarked? Do you really really take a dump in a test tube and perform tests on it to prove its worth (or worthlessness)? Shit is shit. It all stinks, and it's all waste.

Joking, of course. Well, kind of. But I do agree with the original poster that Vista is shit. No need for proof, my own experiences have formed my opinion. Which is just that--an opinion. And since when did an opinion need to be proven as fact?

IMO, Vista is the biggest Windows dud since WinME. While WinME was a buggy, bloated and highly unstable POS, at least Vista is more stable, but its GUI consistency is horrible. Vista is still bloated though (which Win7 improved), and it was released with bad device compatibility (few working drivers).

Edited 2010-05-10 03:04 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2