Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th May 2010 18:39 UTC, submitted by hotice
Gnome The problem with just about every virtual desktop implementation is just that - they're virtual. This means that beyond the ability to move windows to specific desktops, you're still looking at exactly the same desktop, no matter what virtual desktop number you switched to. A mockup for GNOME Shell is trying to take the virtual out of virtual desktop.
Permalink for comment 424428
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Artopal
by Artopal on Fri 14th May 2010 13:54 UTC
Artopal
Member since:
2010-05-12

I for my part like to have 2 workspaces (virtual desktops) and expand them as needed, i.e. I'm constantly creating and deleting workspaces and lack the need of a fixed Ā«meaningĀ» for a workspace (i.e. one for communication, one for work, one for GIMP, etc.).

On the other hand, I like my files handled by the file manager in list view, not scattered on the desktop, so I never use the Desktop folder and find it to be a rather quirky metaphor.

Having different backgrounds and widgets for different workspaces would be nice; the backgrounds being just cosmetics. But for the workspaces to be a visual representation of and thus a way to interact directly with a very real folder with real contents is an annoying thought. I guess I like my desktops virtual. KDE4's folder views are a nice solution -- if you delete the view, you're not deleting the folder, aren't you?

Background: I've never used KDE, only read about it. I'm almost exclusively a GNOME user (Ubuntu) having tried Openbox (Crunchbang) and JWM (Puppy Linux), and Icewm and Fluxbox on occasions.

Reply Score: 1