Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "UDS is over! And in the customary wrap-up I stood up and told the audience what the Foundations team have been discussing all week. One of the items is almost certainly going to get a little bit of publicity. We are going to be doing the work to have btrfs as an installation option, and we have not ruled out making it the default. I do stress the emphasis of that statement, a number of things would have to be true for us to take that decision."
Permalink for comment 424604
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Why?
by Fettarme H-Milch on Sat 15th May 2010 10:11 UTC in reply to "Why?"
Fettarme H-Milch
Member since:
2010-02-16

Why use a default that Grub can't understand?

You make it sound as if that's set in stone. Both are FOSS. Grub2 can be modified to understand Btrfs.
The more important question is: Are Canonical for a change willing to do this by themselves?

Given Canonical's track record, I guess they're waiting for Red Hat to do this in time for them (which already doesn't work out for the Nouveau 3D drivers, because Fedora 14 will be released 1 month after Ubuntu 10.10 and adopting a driver that's even beta by Fedora's bleeding edge standards is not something Canonical will do).

That said, I'm hoping that I get positively surprised by Canonical, though my hopes for that aren't high.

Reply Parent Score: 2