Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th May 2010 19:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 424781
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-01
What in the world are you on about? The Amiga died in the late '90s. Production ceased, third party software support, which had been continually declining ended, Commodore went away, and nothing was left but IP sales and broken promises.
Again, what are you on about? Windows goes back to the mid 80s, just like the Amiga. It's common knowledge that Windows is installed on tens of millions of machines worldwide. Amiga OS is installed on what? A few hundred? Maybe a few thousand? Windows survived (whatever you mean by using that term), thrived, and is successful.
Look, the Amiga was great. Over the years I had a 500, a 2000 w/ Video Toaster, a 1200, and a 4000. They were great machines at the time. But, they're gone, dead and buried. There's nothing in WB 4.0 that is so compelling that it would cause me, or the majority of people, to consider trying to find obscure hardware, pay excessive prices, and fiddle about with it all just to use it.
The Amiga's time has come and gone. Even at it's best currently it's an OS and an idea that is out of place in 2010. I look at WB 4.0 and I see WB 3.1. I see 1995. I see concepts and ideas that we've all moved on from. It's not a 2010 computer. It's a nice memory, that's all.