Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th May 2010 22:23 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "UDS is over! And in the customary wrap-up I stood up and told the audience what the Foundations team have been discussing all week. One of the items is almost certainly going to get a little bit of publicity. We are going to be doing the work to have btrfs as an installation option, and we have not ruled out making it the default. I do stress the emphasis of that statement, a number of things would have to be true for us to take that decision."
Permalink for comment 424869
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by bsharitt
by Kebabbert on Sun 16th May 2010 12:32 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by bsharitt"
Member since:

I dont think you should focus on performance. Is your data safe with XFS, ext4, etc? No. Read these PhD thesis and research papers:

XFS is not safe against data corruption:

And neither is ext3, JFS, ReiserFS, etc:
"I came across the fascinating PhD thesis of Vijayan Prabhakaran, IRON File Systems which analyzes how five commodity journaling file systems - NTFS, ext3, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS - handle storage problems.

In a nutshell he found that the all the file systems have

. . . failure policies that are often inconsistent, sometimes buggy, and generally inadequate in their ability to recover from partial disk failures. "

But ZFS successfully protects your data. Here is an research paper on this:

Reply Parent Score: 2