Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th May 2010 08:49 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 425158
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
The problem was that for the most part, except some fairly good apps, that is pretty much all that the Amiga had going for it: it could format floppies in the background.
Most people do stuff with their computer, other than formatting floppies. Which is why the amiga flopped: lack of good applications.
Most people at the time had no problem using mac, and the big name apps looked like someone had put at least 10 minutes of thought into their design. Whereas for the most part, most Amiga apps looked like a five year old had vomited crayons all over them. Commodore's only value proposition was that it was (initially) an inexpensive powerful computer that someday may do something. While Apple and the PCs were more expensive computers, maybe slightly less powerful, but that could do useful stuff (read apps) right then and there. The "does right now" always trumps "someday may do"
I loved my amiga back in the day, but it did not have the catalog of apps that DOS had, nor it had the same user friendliness the mac had. It was a great geek machine, no doubt. But the geek market is pretty small...
Edited 2010-05-17 20:38 UTC