Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th May 2010 18:59 UTC, submitted by kragil
Permalink for comment 425603
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
Also, Webkit, the most-mentioned apple foss project, is foss for the following reasons:
1) Its a fork of khtml which is LGPL. They could not have changed the license.
2) whole webkit's success was because of wider adoption of it by third parties. if it was closed, it wasnt going to have any success.
and that doesnt make apple open.
That's true. And if I remember well, KHTML devs had to threaten Apple before they released the source ^^
That's one of the reasons why Apple loves BSD licensing : GPL variants are pretty annoying for the proprietary world...