Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th May 2010 22:19 UTC
Multimedia, AV "Prior to Google's announcement of its open sourcing the VP8 video codec, a spokesperson for MPEG LA - the licensing agent that manages the patent portfolio for multimedia technologies relating to the H.264 codec, among others - agreed to answer ten questions submitted to the agency in advance. Those questions regard how it licenses the codec that Microsoft and Apple consider the best solution for HTML 5, the next markup language for the Web." Ten questions, ten answers, and the H264 licensing and royalties mess has managed to become even less clear. Let's compare this to WebM: "You can do whatever you want with the WebM code without owing money to anybody." Now you again, MPEG-LA.
Permalink for comment 425729
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
breath of fresh air
by npcomplete on Fri 21st May 2010 00:44 UTC
npcomplete
Member since:
2009-08-21

reading the h.264 license, understanding its implications and legal conditions, then reading this:

< .. BSD license .. >

"Subject to the terms and conditions of the above License, Google hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer this implementation of VP8, where such license applies only to those patent claims, both currently owned by Google and acquired in the future, licensable by Google that are necessarily infringed by this implementation of VP8."


ahhhhh...

Edited 2010-05-21 00:44 UTC

Reply Score: 3