Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th May 2010 21:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 426684
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-18
There's no real downside to this that I see. While we'd all love greater security than this provides, and it obviously doesn't keep Google from recording what we're up to, it is an extra layer of security at pretty much no cost. I switched my browser to using the new https search immediately upon finding out about it.
You lose the image search, but being aware of that, it's easy to find and use, and it'll probably end up being available with https soon enough anyway.
I see no real downside to this. If anything, it would be nice if more sites used https.