Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 10th Oct 2005 16:48 UTC, submitted by Shlomi Fish
Permalink for comment 42737
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
There are some comments, but many of them may be out of date. I happen to agree with the Extreme Programming camp that it is really better to refactor and make the code easier to understand than to comment redundantly.
Not keeping comments in sync with the code (either by updating or by deleting them) is just sloppy. Referring to the XP refactoring technique is nothing but a cheap excuse - some code is just too complex to stand without comments, and the threshold for that is much lower than most programmers are comfortable to acknowledge.
This doesn't give me much confidence that Mr. Fish actually knows what he is talking about.