Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Jun 2010 22:36 UTC
Google When Google first unveiled its WebM project, there were quite some concerns over its license. This license was incompatible with version 2 and 3 of the GPL, and was effectively a new license, causing unnecessary confusion. Google has now cleared everything up by switching to a regular BSD license.
Permalink for comment 428462
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26

What if Apple decide they like WebM but they want to add their crap feature, call it a new codec and sell it closed? And what if other manufacturers like the Apple idea and they all implement the "improved" codec that is purposely not compatible? We're back at point 0.


Sell it to who? To do this they would have to make it a better value than existing commercial codecs, namely H.264. So what is the worst case scenario here? They provide competition for MPEG-LA?

Reply Parent Score: 2