Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 23:03 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Permalink for comment 429634
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-06
The stock managed to lose another 60% yesterday:
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SCOXQ.PK#chart2:symbol=scoxq....
Considering it's already down to less than 10c, from about $100 ten years ago, I was amazed to find out it was still trading at all (I seem to recall it was pulled out, and reintroduced under a new name; it used to be SCOX if I remember correctly).