Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jun 2010 22:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 429943
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-10
...is the f'ing problem with Adobe? Seriously? 64 bit is a problem? Really? The fact that the architecture has been commercially available for, oh I don't know, 6+ years apparently makes no difference to them?
I mean, of all the laggy, crappy, feature-bloated applications their team of programmers seems to usher out of the pig-trough year after year, you'd think THIS software house would have been the first to jump on the 64 bit bandwagon. Simply amazing.
Maybe Jobs is right in giving these guys the double-barreled middle finger, with a twist. Maybe the entire industry should take a moment to reflect on the whole "Adobe Situation" and then move on to potentially greener pastures elsewhere.
</end rant>