Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Mon 14th Jun 2010 23:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 430104
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
The problem at hand could have indeed been solved using trusted and trustworthy repositories.
However if the software has bugs, like using gets(), but really many kinds of bugs can do. You rely on exploit prevention and mitigation which is on par with Windows and still not at modern levels.
Then there is another whole class of exploits helped by people keeping all doors open in their servers, most of which use Linux, but could use anything.
This is not GPL code vs everyone else, it is distributors(GPLd and Proprietary) not fixing fixable things for whatever dark reason they have.
Your beloved Linux has "free" code(often just changing a number here and there) to prevent many exploits currently affecting faithful users like you. However, if they are not enabled by default it's as if they never were there when the system is used by a normal user. Ship with all doors closed and write down why it is dangerous to open them and the user will get the chance to think twice.
Let's just say that "insecure by default" doesn't make a good slogan.
Meanwhile, in the real world, we actually get this situation:
http://gorumors.com/crunchies/malware-infection-rate-worldwide/
When they say "malware infected PCs", they actually mean an estimated level of "malware infected Windows machines".
This is the status-quo level at which the proverbial "bar has been set". Linux machines must be able to better this standard to come off well in comparison with machines that are commonly marketed today.
ROFLMAO.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/106/289981080_4008fa579a.jpg
Wait though ... it gets better. Here is an expert opinion on the value for money of the status quo machines being mass-marketed today:
http://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/?p=359
Here is the situation with the worlds highest-performing, most expensive, highest-value machines:
http://techie-buzz.com/foss/linux-powers-91-of-the-worlds-top-500-f...
http://cache.techie-buzz.com/images/postimg/ricky/supercomputer1.pn...
Edited 2010-06-15 12:23 UTC