Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Mon 14th Jun 2010 23:58 UTC
Permalink for comment 430216
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Doomed?
No users system got any malware through the debian openssl error.
Security hole? No, the openssl error reduced the security of openssl on Debian systems for a time, but it was a weakness, not a hole. It meant taht an attacker, who knew about the weakness, would have required significantly less time for a brute force attack against openssl than should have been needed. No end user's system was ever breached because of it.
Spreading to all OSes? No. It was an error, that resulted in weaker openssl for some time on debian systems, and which was corrected when it was discovered in an audit at Debian.
Please stick to the facts, OK? No system can eliminate errors. This particular error resulted in no harm before it was fixed.
Zealot? Exactly who is spreading the lies and invictive here, hmmmm?
Edited 2010-06-15 23:25 UTC