Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 430560
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Every time another distro is created, some complain "Why do we need another distro? It'll never have enough users to matter; it just takes away from distro A or B".
I think it's actually a good thing, the distro doesn't have to become the "next greatest thing", it just needs to scratch a particular itch, try some ideas that may be too drastic in the established distros...
If it has good ideas, the common large distros will adopt (or "copy" if you like to complain) some of the changes and we'll all be better for it, maybe the new distro presenting the alternative viewpoint won't be needed at some point in the future because everyone else implemented the good ideas from this one and it'll naturally die off because it's unneeded.
Some good ideas are a bit extreme and may never get adopted or may take longer to get adopted (filesystem structure from Gobo comes to mind); but I definitely think they should be tried.