Linked by David Adams on Fri 18th Jun 2010 19:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 430778
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
Fair enough. I agree that in isolation (without Linux) WINE is not an emulator.
I don't think this is a valid context, though. Software always relies on some sort of primitives (be it interpreter, libraries, OS calls or CPU instructions). This way every program should be called "a layer".
Back to GNU&WINE. Don't you find it interesting that, when expanded, they actually include words "Unix" and "Emulator"? This is a clear invitation to consider whether or not they have anything to do with Unix or a Windows emulator. Just think of all these discussions that have happened already. That's how far you can go without violating someone's trademarks and still have your message passed through.