Linked by Igor Ljubuncic on Mon 21st Jun 2010 09:35 UTC
Permalink for comment 430925
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-09
Dedoimedo here. First, this is the first article posting here, so please excuse the few rough points, like the missing space in paragraph one and such, will be sorted out. Be gentle.
Now, thanks for the comments.
Linux security: we can argue about this to death, but the point is: it's all about statistical probability.
I think the home usage security card is seriously overplayed, regardless of the operating system used and if you get it right, the operating system becomes a non-issue. Real security is agnostic.
Exploits exist, vulnerabilities exist. On the same note, huge meteors exist and cosmic ray bursts exist. Likelihood of witnessing one before imminent doom? Not very high.
If you don't go about wildly executing stuff, then you won't see the pixel devils take over your machine.
Cheers,
Dedoimedo
This is exactly the same security mistake that Microsoft made in the 80s and 90s.