Linked by David Adams on Thu 24th Jun 2010 16:22 UTC, submitted by Governa
Permalink for comment 431374
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
Well, there's actually a 3rd option where you could be prompted the first time such usage is actually requested with the option to keep being alerted each time or to "always allow" for that app. This still might not entirely cure the issue but it is then at least up to the user whether to completely trust an app or not and/or when to decide to trust it. The plus side to this, also, is that a malicious coder has no way of knowing when the client would "trust" the app - unlike now, knowing that if it makes it past the install it is home free.
I believe a similar scheme is already used on certain smartphone OS's for things such as Location Services.
Edited 2010-06-24 20:47 UTC