Linked by David Adams on Thu 24th Jun 2010 16:22 UTC, submitted by Governa
Permalink for comment 431432
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
The problem with the "PEWTD - Problem Exists With The Designer" thinking is that some designers deliberately design malicious code. When they do so, they will also do their utmost to obscure the fact that the code is malicious from the end user.
According to this article:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365651,00.asp
Where the Google spokesperson (Cannings) says this:
Google themselves are apparently going to take responsibility for "malicious applications". If Google are alerted by one end user to the existence of a malicious application, or if Google identify such an application themselves, they apparently can and will take action and delete it from everybody's android phone.
Edited 2010-06-25 05:57 UTC