Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Jun 2010 22:56 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 431529
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-11-25
As has already been alluded to, the difference is that if Google do this, one is perfectly free to go online and install the .apk without using the market.
With iOS, one has to either set up a private (<=100 users) app repository, or gaolbreak the iPhone, which voids the warranty.
Because in this case, it was malware, it is acceptable, however I feel that close attention needs to be paid in order to ensure that google do not abuse this power, despite users having the option to install from third party sources.