Linked by David Adams on Thu 1st Jul 2010 05:02 UTC
Permalink for comment 432133
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Not surprising. I think the Danger deal was started before the success of the iPhone, which, of course, profoundly changed the business. After the iPhone, Danger's phones weren't as desirable as they used to be. Consequently, the acquisition became a lemon.
So, why still release the Kin? Well, I'm talking out of my ass here, but is it possible that part of the deal was that Microsoft wouldn't instantly kill Danger, but had to come with a successor instead?
If so, it would explain this product and move. Microsoft made the most of it and experimented with interface ideas on a product they could get feedback on - and the feedback has, in fact, been positive (interface-wise).
So, now they can shove these ideas back into Windows PHone 7. Clever.