Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 10th Oct 2005 16:48 UTC, submitted by Shlomi Fish
Permalink for comment 43255
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
This is one of the only webpages where I've had to turn off page styles in order to read it - yikes!
I take issue with most of the article (as does everyone on this thread, it seems), but particularly the argument that C is inherently portable. I'm sure there are platforms without a libc where there's e.g. a java VM (I'm thinking some specialised phone situations, for example) - you just forget you need libc since it's so often there. Lovely also to have portability argued within the vacinity of 'UNIXisms'