Linked by David Adams on Wed 7th Jul 2010 19:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 432778
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-04-25
It's being compared to a traditional home computer, when it's really more similar to a TV + cable box.
I can't modify the software on my TV. Nor on my HD cable box. They are closed devices designed for consuming content. If I want to rent a movie on my HD cable box I have to purchase through my cable company. Luckily there are other sources to get content (movie rentals/purchases, or bittorrent if that's your thing), but that requires the purchase of separate devices.
Same goes with the iPad. It's meant for consuming content. A nice thing about it is that the web contains far better content than my TV's antenna can pick up. And the app store/itunes is far more permissive of allowing publishers to sell content than my local cable company is.
This idea that it's meant to replace real computers wholesale is absurd. It's meant to replace computers at certain tasks, namely portable content consumption that traditionally has been the realm of laptops and netbooks. And in that regard it's mostly a good replacement. It may even be useful for light content creation duties as well, but it seems ill suited to replace traditional PCs for the heavy duty tasks.