Linked by David Adams on Wed 7th Jul 2010 19:09 UTC
Apple A Forbes article notices that while the iPad's reception from the public and the mainstream press has been overwhelmingly positive, the prevailing sentiment among some alpha geeks has been negative to the extreme. The conclusion, of course, is that these people aren't reacting to what the iPad is, but rather what it represents: a violation of the ethos of the personal computer. The author of the Forbes article concludes that much of the anti-iPad vitriol is hyperbole, and doesn't help advance the cause. It's a thought-provoking question.
Permalink for comment 432872
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Forbes
by targetnovember on Thu 8th Jul 2010 16:38 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Forbes"
targetnovember
Member since:
2010-04-27

Should a company have control over how its network or services are accessed? Is denying unauthorized use different from controlling a person's product they purchased? I can see a rational argument for "here's your phone to use on our network, but we provide access to our network under certain conditions. If you modify the device, we can cut off access to our service." You can hack your property anyway you want, but if you void an agreement on a service you consume, then that service can be stopped. Assuming there's a contract, at least.

Reply Parent Score: 1