Linked by David Adams on Wed 7th Jul 2010 19:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 433074
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
...there are some points to analyze about your statement.
1) Why does Apple don't allow the regular user to continue the limited restrictive experience, and allow the advanced users to install apps from other sources? Apple patches their system to don't allow this hacks and void the warranty to anybody that does Jailbreak.
2) Why don't Apple keep with the crazy restrictions about Flash apps on their Apple Store, but leaves the door open for advanced user to install other kind (non native) applications in a legal way?
Apple can still offer the "experience" they propose to the non-technical people and allow the advanced users to hack and experiment with the device, but Apple don't want people using the iPad beyond the boundaries they rule.
...but this had been historically the Apple weak point. They set their own limitation and a competitor shows up without them, so Apple turn into a niche.