Linked by David Adams on Wed 7th Jul 2010 19:09 UTC
Apple A Forbes article notices that while the iPad's reception from the public and the mainstream press has been overwhelmingly positive, the prevailing sentiment among some alpha geeks has been negative to the extreme. The conclusion, of course, is that these people aren't reacting to what the iPad is, but rather what it represents: a violation of the ethos of the personal computer. The author of the Forbes article concludes that much of the anti-iPad vitriol is hyperbole, and doesn't help advance the cause. It's a thought-provoking question.
Permalink for comment 433180
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by truckweb
by robco74 on Mon 12th Jul 2010 00:30 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by truckweb"
Member since:


From your Gizmodo article:

"The iPad has everyone thinking about the future of computing, but one of its greatest achievements is what it lets you forget about: battery. We pushed the iPad as hard as we could and got nearly 6 hours of use.

Early reports had the iPad's battery lasting even longer than Apple's 10 hour estimate—up to 11 and 12 hours of continuous video playback in some cases. In our test, during which we alternated between streaming video and playing graphic-intensive games, with Wi-Fi on, brightness at its highest, and the speaker at its loudest setting the entire time, the iPad's battery lasted 5 hours, 54 minutes.

By any measure, these are fantastic times, and they're essential to the success of this new type of device."

Reply Parent Score: 1