Linked by Mufasa on Tue 13th Jul 2010 15:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 433397
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
It is one thing to talk about micropayments for a site with a full staff of editors, video producers, etc, etc. It is however preposterous to think people will (micro)pay just to see a blog where some guy might or might not just be talking out of his ass, you won't know until you've paid up. Even well-known bloggers would probably generate bad publicity by "closing" their blogs.
Also, think about the fact that the gaming-proneness of the system would skyrocket to ridiculous levels, assuming these micropayments were to bring in significantly more money per hit than ad-based revenues, since the motivation for gaming the system would be that much greater.
I'm sorry, but just blurting the word "micropayments" as the solution to all of our problems is not bringing anything to the table.
If you ask me, flat-rate subscription services that cover a broad range of content providers are the next big thing. In fact, they are the only thing I can imagine actually working long-term in this brave new world.
It'll be a lot like the socialized funding for the arts, sciences, etc. that most countries already have in place. Just the structure, scope and accessibility will be a lot better.