Linked by David Adams on Wed 14th Jul 2010 21:28 UTC, submitted by No Body
Permalink for comment 433508
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-19
Those who need DOS or Win 3.1 today. (Probably).
Many industrial control applications, or older appliances rely on ancient operating environments. Given many does not even have any source code left, it's better to support the old OS for this minority.
And I believe MS would be fine, as long as people continue to pay for support contracts.
However, desktops are different beasts, though. MS probably wants to kill XP support on end user computers "yesterday".