Linked by David Adams on Fri 16th Jul 2010 19:44 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Permalink for comment 433814
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Here: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/
If you browse through the directories, you'll see that many files were last modified within the last few days (even if the date of a folder itself says May).
Maybe Oracle is not interested in OpenSolaris, but we can't know for a fact. All we know is that Oracle is just silent, the source repo is still active, and OpenSolaris never was GPLv3-licensed.
Or even the ONNV mailing list:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/onnv-notify/2010-July/thread....
I guess the problem is that for many there is a transition from the culture at Sun to the culture at Oracle with Oracle having to take a good stock take of what they've bought and turning each into a revenue generating machine. Personally I'd be more concerned if we are having the same discussion in 2011 at this time though but from what I have heard when Oracle has their big development expo later this year apparently the future will be made a lot clearer.