Linked by David Adams on Fri 16th Jul 2010 19:44 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris A Computerworld blog speculates that the open-source Unix distribution may live on, but Oracle won't be supporting it. At this point, "OpenSolaris' only real future is as a fork, which would not be easy to pull off. Still, with enough interest from developers it could be done. OpenSolaris is licensed under the GPLv3 CDDL and various other OSS licenses, so the base code is available."
Permalink for comment 434063
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by ulrus
by kaiwai on Tue 20th Jul 2010 01:47 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by ulrus"
Member since:

If Solaris was GPL, you would see code sharing. How do you explain porting ZFS to BSD? They are so vastly different how is that possible?

God f-cking knows why you were moderated up - I had ignored your post hoping it would die the death of a thousand people ignoring it.

The gap between OpenSolaris and FreeBSD is a lot smaller than the gap between Linux and FreeBSD. With that being said, the sharing of code still required massive amounts of work, it wasn't simply a matter of grabbing the code, rejigging some headers and compilation. The question is whether it is worth all the effort put into porting code to and fro between platforms of any benefit given the work required to do so. Also, not all kernel modules are created the same, some can be easy ported whilst others can't - some simply require a basic abstraction layer such as Haiku-OS and the FreeBSD Wireless stack and others are more complex such as audio drivers that dig deep into the kernel for maximum performance and low latency.

Edited 2010-07-20 01:50 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2