Linked by gsyoungblood on Tue 20th Jul 2010 18:01 UTC
Permalink for comment 434094
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-26
By the way, wasn´t the GPLv3 designed to prevent things like this?
Yes, but I don't think it applies if you can upgrade the parts of the phone that are gpl3.
So if you have program "foo" (licensed under gpl3) installed, and you can upgrade program "foo" to a modified version without breaking the phone, you are in compliance with gpl3.
Motorola is free to wedge the phone if you modify the kernel, for example - because kernel is under gpl2. It may be that the phone has no gpl3 software in the first place.