Linked by David Adams on Mon 19th Jul 2010 15:56 UTC, submitted by Jonathan DePrizio
Permalink for comment 434104
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
Well, actually I've only seen 3 benchmarks (here's another of them http://lifehacker.com/5457242/browser-speed-tests-firefox-36-chrome...) of the current crop of browsers, and all of them showed that Firefox used the least amount of memory when viewing multiple pages. This is something Mozilla has actively worked on so it's not a surprise. As for task manager, it's great to use for measurement if you know what it is you are looking at. I know Microsoft made some changes to it in Vista and Windows 7 so I can't vouch for that version, but in XP is does it's job very well. Perhaps you can enlighten me to why you find it inaccurate? Also, perhaps YOU could provide me with some tests that support YOUR claims?