Linked by David Adams on Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:05 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 434911
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't know what you've been reading but Microsoft has relocated a tonne of code into particular DLL's and the only thing that has been done from there is creating stubs that re-direct calls from third parties and old software to the new DLL's. The changes at the core have already been made - the only reason for the DLL redirects is for backwards compatibility. I can bloody well assure you if they didn't include these DLL redirects there would be hell to pay.