Linked by David Adams on Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:38 UTC
Permalink for comment 434959
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
I completely agree with this. KDE 4.0 was fine for what it was designed to do. It was basically a technology preview. Sadly, a lot of package managers and users jumped on the release and tried to use it full time, which wasn't at all what it was intended for.
People are already doing the same thing with Gnome Shell, downloading it and running it and complaining it isn't good enough. But it isn't due for its official release for about another six months.
It's great to try new tech and give the developers (KDE or Gnome) some feedback, but people shouldn't publically whine about beta code not being perfect.