Linked by David Adams on Sat 31st Jul 2010 06:05 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 434978
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
That's not an example of something being half-baked, though. Apple wasn't in the habit, at that point, of making hardware or software for Windows users. Just because something doesn't fit your personal needs, that doesn't mean it doesn't work as intended.
Yeah, I remember MM. Hated it. lol Though, I seem to recall early iPods working with MM on Windows.
I'm not aware of the story, though Office X was released fairly soon after OS X was released, around 6 months, IIRC.
Probably some truth on the latter statement, although the first one sounds like hyperbole to me. The UI and ease of use of OS X 10.0 was perfectly sound, if cosmetically questionable.
Edited 2010-08-01 03:06 UTC