Linked by David Adams on Mon 2nd Aug 2010 03:53 UTC, submitted by fsmag
Permalink for comment 435139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-26
They get free software as a means to lower their development costs, not because they share any kind of ideals with the open source community.
This is absolutely not true. Free Software doesn't necessarily lower the development costs, esp. when you are doing all the development from your own budget (as Nokia is doing with Qt, for example).
Doing free software has the promise of being ubiquitous, and palatable to wide mass of developers (because free software ensures a company can't screw you over if/when you decide to "buy in" on a given technology). Both Google and Nokia get this, and it's pretty much compatible with ideals of the open source community to me.