Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux As we mentioned in a previous article, Red Hat advocate Greg DeKoenigsberg claimed that due to the much larger amount of code it's contributed, Red Hat is a better open source citizen than Canonical, adding, "Canonical is a marketing organization masquerading as an engineering organization." A Computerworld blog retorts that that's no insult; and that marketing Linux could be just as important to the cause as contributing code. Updated
Permalink for comment 435231
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26

In spite of Red Hat's significant technological contributions to Linux in general, and the inroads they have made with Linux on servers, they never made much of a dent in the average Joe desktop market.


Where did Ubuntu make a dent? Linux has the same 1% and 40% of those users are running KDE.

If Linux had doubled in share from the first release of Ubuntu I would agree but this is not the case and the fact that the KDE/GNOME divide still exists shows that Ubuntu has just been the most popular Gnome distro, not some new force making inroads within the mainstream.

Sure there are plenty of blog posts about switching Grandma to Ubuntu but there were plenty of those types of posts before Ubuntu existed. If you look at distrowatch you can see that Ubuntu is not that far ahead of the other distros.

Reply Parent Score: 2