Linked by David Adams on Tue 3rd Aug 2010 16:05 UTC, submitted by sjvn
Linux As we mentioned in a previous article, Red Hat advocate Greg DeKoenigsberg claimed that due to the much larger amount of code it's contributed, Red Hat is a better open source citizen than Canonical, adding, "Canonical is a marketing organization masquerading as an engineering organization." A Computerworld blog retorts that that's no insult; and that marketing Linux could be just as important to the cause as contributing code. Updated
Permalink for comment 435434
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Who really contributes the most to Linux?
by Lunitik on Wed 4th Aug 2010 21:20 UTC
Member since:

Here is a simple way to answer this question:

If both Red Hat and Canonical went away tomorrow, which would be most missed?

If Ubuntu went away, nothing changes, everyone just goes to a different distro, and they are forgotten in time like the likes of Libranet and Linspire before them.

If Red Hat went away, the entire Linux community would crawl to a standstill trying to pick up the slack. The community would lose its best contributors, its leaders, and would likely never really recover.

Reply Score: 3