Linked by Universal Mind on Fri 6th Aug 2010 16:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 435652
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-08
"Granted, I totally ignored costs for drives, memory and graphics card."
I'm not sure that this article is going to find accurate results. The market for CPUs has really changed in the last few years. We all remember the Ghz race, but today the CPUs are trying to get wide and control heat. Because we are not really looking for perf from the CPU anymore there is increasing emphasis on RAM and graphics cards. I'm willing to bet that the percentage cost of both of these components went up during the sampled period.
I like the analysis, but really wish he had looked at the cost of more components in the system. I really don't think there is enough here to draw any conclusions.