Linked by Universal Mind on Fri 6th Aug 2010 16:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 435747
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-20
OK I might be worng on this one, but well Apple did at least pay some money to get the best environment firendly product report ( either they actually invest some money into more environment friendly product, or they bribe very well, the latter would be closer to reality as they got their device produced in the same factory as everyone else ).
But at leat Apple is not that much reponsible for an environment disaster (yet!), and yes I am taking in account all those Apple product dumped as soon as there a new generation coming.