Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Aug 2010 22:58 UTC, submitted by Alex Forster
Permalink for comment 436758
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-27
"confirmed by James Gosling"
Gosling confirmed that Oracle showed an interest the patent situation between Sun and Google, but that's not the same as confirming the accusation that "Schwartz Pitched Google Lawsuit to Oracle".
I'm documenting the whole case here:
http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Oracle_v._Google_%282010,_USA%29
Update: Reading De Icaza's post (which he updated earlier today) - he didn't even initially say that "Schwartz Pitched Google Lawsuit to Oracle". No one said that. De Icaza just threw it around as a theory, and then he announced that it was confirmed by Gosling's post (which didn't confirm that at all).
This story has no substance.
Edited 2010-08-14 01:41 UTC