Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Aug 2010 22:58 UTC, submitted by Alex Forster
Legal We're far from done with the Oracle v. Google lawsuit. The search giant has responded to the lawsuit, and Miguel De Icaza has provided a very interesting insight into the case. His report has been confirmed by James Gosling, known as the father of Java who left Sun right after the merger. Icaza speculates that the potential to monetise on Java by suing Google was pitched by Jonathan Schwartz during Sun's sales talks with Oracle. Oh boy.
Permalink for comment 436834
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: People forget
by nt_jerkface on Sat 14th Aug 2010 18:40 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: People forget"
Member since:

There are no Java libraries in Dalvik.[/i] There are libraries with the same names (and to some extend same method names), but that's also the case in Kaffe.

So what is your position again? Google isn't using Java even though they call it Java and use the Java language along with a Java-like VM that includes libraries that have the same names and methods as official Java libraries?

What matters is whether the clone violates patents and whether Google has been using code from Oracle without license.

This is what I have been saying from the beginning, it's the patents that really matter. You are the one that went on some strange "it isn't Java" tangent.

Given the obvious PR cost I'm sure Oracle's lawyers are confident that they have a case.

But I do like how people such as yourself are going to great lengths to defend Google over their non-standard Java that they designed to get around Sun's JME licensing fees. Only Google can go against cross-platform development standards and cut out a major funder of open source just to have continued free defense from people like you.

Reply Parent Score: 0