Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 16th Aug 2010 06:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 437170
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-28
All the naysayers do not realize that videoconference on the tv will be pretty huge. This is directed at families that have to spend time away from each other and who can now easily see each other without having to deal with a standard "computer". They just get calls from Dad on the TV.
My Panasonic Viera already does this with Skype and it has been wonderful for my 3-year old to be able to see and interact with his grandparents who are on the other side of the Atlantic.
So, no, this will not substitute the phone for everyday calls. Nobody wants that. That doesn´t mean that there isn´t a market or a need for it.
It would be a hell of a lot better if the protocol in use wasn´t skype, but something open and that had been subjected to serious academic scrutiny.