Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Aug 2010 18:29 UTC
Permalink for comment 438004
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-27
1. In terms of UI it was a major improvement of Windows 3.1
2. It ran faster then Linux with Xwindows on low memory systems.
3. It had a slew of hardware drivers.
4. Compatibility with Old DOS and WIndows 3.1 Apps.
5. Mac OS had its own problems that the Mac Fan Boy will never mention unless comparing it with a new version of the same OS
It really took to 1999 for the standard PC to have enough horse power to support more enterprise level operating systems. Windows 95 and 98 were really a gateway OS. That gave the common folk access to multi-tasking and networking.