Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Aug 2010 23:22 UTC, submitted by historyb
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris The OpenSolaris governing board fell on its collective sword Monday and resigned en masse after Oracle continued to ignore its ultimatum to appoint a liaison guy to work with it on the future of the open source project. The move was anticlimactic to say the least. Oracle last week leaked an internal e-mail into the wild effectively saying OpenSolaris is dead. The news of the mass resignation, coupled with Oracle suing Google claiming Android infringes on its Java patents, had Adobe's director of open source and standards David McAllister casting Oracle as the New Microsoft and saying "the axis of evil has shifted south about 850 miles or so".
Permalink for comment 438401
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I'm an OpenSolaris user
by kaiwai on Fri 27th Aug 2010 03:01 UTC in reply to "I'm an OpenSolaris user"
Member since:

What's wrong with waiting later this year for Solaris 11 Express and using it? It'll come with optional support which should be cheap like around $20. Unless I'm missing something.

I get the openness will be done away with but isn't it going to be better?

From what I understand it appears that Oracle is putting more money into Solaris than Sun ever did - for example there is in developed to replace all other power backends a (and scheduled for release 2011Q4) libpower that'll provide a unified framework for power management which will hopefully be exposed in a nice user friendly way as an alternative to the upower backend used in GNOME at the moment. I wonder whether we'll see the same in the form of replacing HAL when it comes to hardware detection and automounting of storage on the desktop. All these may sound like they're outside the scope of Oracle's goal until you realise that Solaris is in effect a desktop operating system by virtue of people using it through Sun Ray terminals.

Although I'm disappointed about the development becoming more closed source, if it means that development resources are increased in the area then I think it is a good compromise given that the alternative is a slow death through neglect and lack of investment.

Reply Parent Score: 4