Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Aug 2010 23:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 438445
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-04-23
Mainframes traditionally had relatively slow processors, coupled to memory that was more than able to keep up with it...
It's low end machines which have faster processors that are severely bottlenecked by memory speeds, because buyers look at the processor speed and don't consider other aspects of the system...
I would be extremely surprised if IBM hasn't designed a suitably fast memory system to go with this processor.