Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Aug 2010 23:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 438535
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
No, you are all missing the point.
It is not that a computer is as fast as it slowest component. The whole point of computer architecture is to make the common case fast. Veeeeery different.
So yeah, the booting speeds may have not progressed that much since they are constrained to the speed of the disk subsystem, which indeed is quite slow. But booting up is not the common case, is it? Running code is. And for the most part, most modern computers tend to utilize their processors rather well, try running a modern game on an old P3. This like databases etc are obviously more sensitive to I/O, but the machines used to run them are not necessarily comparable to a modern single user PC.