Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Sep 2010 15:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 440809
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-24
Swiss ISP have never been forced to reveal IP without a court decision. This isn't what the judgement is about.
What was happening is that Logistep was collecting IP of file-sharers. They then offered to the music/movies companies a list of IP downloading their copyrighted material. The music/movies companies could then use these IP to file a lawsuit and THEN, but only then and with a court approval, the ISP would be forced to reveal who is the person behind the IP.
So really, this judgement is just about the fact that collecting IP addresses on the internet WITHOUT the user consent is illegal in Switzerland.
Yeah, that has pretty wide consequences that go far beyond file-sharing.