Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 441125
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-16
"Evil is generally accepted to be defined as the intention of causing harm or destruction while threatening or deliberately violating morality."
Did Canonical burn your computer or something? Killed your cat?
What I'm saying is, Ubuntu is providing a driver that WORKS. Users don't care about experimental, half-working drivers, trust me.
They will be giving their users the best experience. How's that not true?
It's like saying Windows doesn't give people the best experience because Microsoft didn't work on the nVIDIA/ATI drivers.
I am tempted to try this, but I don't have a 2nd hard drive to spare. I'm farily confident Fedora's installer is a bit more cryptic than Ubuntu's.
Good. That means they are using the most sensible solution and not jumping on the ITLLWORKLATER projects that pop up every year or so.
Why aren't you trying to improve the frontends? Oh, wait, it's easier to call out Canonical.
Again, it's GPL. They can take it, modify it, and even sell it. All without being required to contribute back.
Oh, it doesn't? Hey, let's use my distro's package manager to remo-- darn it.